Case Law Index
federal2023
Additional Highlights:First AmendmentTrue ThreatsCriminal Law

Counterman v. Colorado

United States Supreme Court

Key Holding

The First Amendment requires that a true threats prosecution prove the defendant had at least a reckless disregard as to whether the communication would be regarded as a threat.

Case Summary

Counterman v. Colorado held that the government must prove a defendant was at least reckless in sending messages a reasonable person would view as threatening, striking a balance between protecting victims of threatening communications and ensuring robust First Amendment protection for speech.

Powered by TrustFoundry

Search 15M+ cases and statutes via API

Explore the API