Case Law Index
federal2020
Additional Highlights:Administrative LawDACAAPA

Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California

United States Supreme Court

Key Holding

The Trump Administration's rescission of the DACA program was arbitrary and capricious under the APA because it failed to consider important reliance interests of DACA recipients.

Case Summary

DHS v. Regents of the University of California held that the Administration's decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act, preserving DACA protections while allowing the government to try again with a more reasoned explanation.

Powered by TrustFoundry

Search 15M+ cases and statutes via API

Explore the API